Regime: Φₛ-H (Room IV Anchor)
Formal condition (anchor):
∀x∈X, ∃ i≠j: ∣ψi(x)∣>ϵ, ∣ψj(x)∣>ϵandmaxiwi≤α (α<0.85)∀x∈X,∃i=j:∣ψi(x)∣>ϵ,∣ψj(x)∣>ϵandimaxwi≤α(α<0.85)
Wall Text (short, gallery-ready)
Logos presents a lawful field in which more than one future remains simultaneously possible. Nothing collapses into a final object. Instead, the composition sustains overlapping “states” that compete and cohere at once—an image of disciplined multiplicity. The work reads differently with sustained attention: dominance shifts, but no layer disappears. This is not ambiguity as confusion; it is plurality as structure.
Handout note (collector-facing)
The anchor is non-editioned in spirit: it functions as the reference field for Room IV. Later works derive local slices from this field.
Regime: Φₛ-H (Room IV Anchor)
Formal condition (anchor):
∀x∈X, ∃ i≠j: ∣ψi(x)∣>ϵ, ∣ψj(x)∣>ϵandmaxiwi≤α (α<0.85)∀x∈X,∃i=j:∣ψi(x)∣>ϵ,∣ψj(x)∣>ϵandimaxwi≤α(α<0.85)
Wall Text (short, gallery-ready)
Logos presents a lawful field in which more than one future remains simultaneously possible. Nothing collapses into a final object. Instead, the composition sustains overlapping “states” that compete and cohere at once—an image of disciplined multiplicity. The work reads differently with sustained attention: dominance shifts, but no layer disappears. This is not ambiguity as confusion; it is plurality as structure.
Handout note (collector-facing)
The anchor is non-editioned in spirit: it functions as the reference field for Room IV. Later works derive local slices from this field.
